Retirement planning should, but often doesn’t, include what an individual or a couple plan to do with their house, as a recent article in The Wall Street Journal points out.
“But for many retirees, it can pay to downsize sooner rather than later.”
While the author admits the financial benefits to making the change, especially when compared with the hassle involved, may be relatively modest, even that can help making for a more financially comfortable post-work lifestyle.
“Some of the reluctance stems from the idea that trading a house with a paid-off mortgage for a rental or a condominium with maintenance or association fees will lead to higher monthly costs Lauricella writes. “That can be a mirage, says Lawrence Glazer, a financial planner at Mayflower Advisors in Boston.”
“In a home, the expenses are hidden,” Glazer is quoted as saying. “It’s maintenance, a roof, a boiler, heating and landscaping.”
Glazer also advises against keeping a home because it can more readily accommodate visits from children and grandchildren.
“Rather than clinging on to a three-bedroom and paying for the maintenance and heating, it’s cheaper to put [relatives] up in a hotel room,” he told the writer.
“Trading for the more visible costs of a rental or condo can help with planning, notes David Schwartz, chief executive at advisory firm FCE Group in Great Neck, N.Y.,” according to the Journal article.
“You know what your fixed costs are going to be,” Schwartz said.
Downsizing A Home Should Be On Retirement Planning Table
with
no comment